Single judge allowed application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. granting bail to appellant Bhagirath during pendency of criminal appeal against seven-year sentence for sections 366 and 376 IPC, noting parity with co-accused and heavy pendency.
Appellant released on personal bond and two sureties subject to deposit of fine amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2591 of 2024
Appellant :- Bhagirath Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Anand Kumar Shukla,Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order on Application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
Order on Appeal
Order Date :- 29.8.2024 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to bail bond during the pendency of the criminal appeal.
Whether the case constitutes a fit case for grant of bail considering heavy pendency and custody period.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhagirath
State of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
