This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2500 of 2024
Appellant :- Raghu Yadav @ Raghunath Yadav And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Anand Pratap Singh,Lakshmana Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Heard.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants prays that he may be permitted to delete respondent No.2 from the array of the parties.
Let necessary corrections be carried out during the course of the day.
Issue notice to respondent No.3 (now respondent No.2).
Considering the arguments as raised by the learned counsel for the appellants, whenever the case is next listed, list on the date indicated in the notice as fresh.
Order Date :- 14.8.2024 prateek
Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Raghu Yadav @ Raghunath Yadav And 2 Others
State Of U.P.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court