The High Court adjourned Criminal Appeal No. 2111 of 2024 for four weeks. The court reiterated that the mere pendency of the appeal does not constitute interference with the lower court's order.
Adjournment for four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2111 of 2024
Appellant :- Kalim @ Mohammad Kalim Khan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another
Counsel for Appellant :- Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi,Devendra Verma,Kajol,Nitin Verma,Tanupriya Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
On the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list this case after four weeks.
It is reiterated that mere pendency of this appeal would not construed as if this Court has interfered with the order of the learned court meaning thereby that the proceedings shall continue without being influenced by the pendency of the instant appeal.
Order Date :- 9.8.2024 S. Shivhare
Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kalim @ Mohammad Kalim Khan And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
