Criminal appeal relating to a bail application was adjourned to the week commencing 04.11.2024 to allow opposite parties nos.2 to 4, already served with notice, to file objections if they so desire.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1694 of 2024
Appellant :- Ayodhya Prasad Rawat Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Sapana Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard Ms. Sapana Verma, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Anurag Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State.
From a perusal of record it transpires that the notices upon opposite party nos.2 to 4 have already been served.
However, with a view to afford an effective opportunity of representation, list again in the week commencing 04.11.2024 to enable opposite parties nos.2 to 4 to file objections against the bail application, if they so desire.
(Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.)
Order Date :- 15.10.2024 A.Dewal
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ayodhya Prasad Rawat
State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
