Shiv Prakash v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 1671 of 2002 died during the pendency of the appeal. The court abated the instant appeal in view of the reports from the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is abated as the sole appellant has expired during the pendency of the appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45447
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1671 of 2002
Appellant :- Shiv Prakash Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Chandra Shekher Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
As per report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya dated 04.03.2024, the sole appellant, Shiv Prakash had already been expired during pendency of the appeal.
In view of the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya dated 04.03.2024, the instant appeal stands abated.
Trial court record, if any, be sent back to the court concerned.
Consign to record.
Order Date :- 4.7.2024 Saurabh
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shiv Prakash
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1671/2002
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court