Mohammad Haneef and Another. v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal abated due to death of appellants. No trial for adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Appeal abated and record sent back to the court concerned.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45187
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1509 of 2002
Appellant :- Mohammad Haneef And Another. Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Shivani Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
As per report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitapur dated 05.03.2024, the appellants, Mohammad Haneef and Mohammad Islam had already been expired during pendency of the appeal.
In view of the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitapur dated 05.03.2024, the instant appeal stands abated.
Trial court record, if any, be sent back to the court concerned.
Consign to record.
Order Date :- 3.7.2024 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohammad Haneef
- appellant
Mohammad Islam
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1509/2002
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court