Criminal appeal adjourned because counsel for respondent no.2 was reported ill; court stipulated no further adjournment at the complainant's behest and listed the case for a future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 15
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1621 of 2024
Appellant :- Malguram Nishad @ Malgu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Jyoti Rawat,Ram Samujh Rawat Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Rajeev Mishra
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
3. List this case on 16.10.2024.
Order Date :- 26.9.2024 Anupam S/-
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Malguram Nishad @ Malgu
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Rajeev Mishra (respondent no.2/complainant)
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
