Criminal appeal against conviction was admitted with a direction to summon the trial court record. The court directed the appellant to implead the informant as respondent no.2, holding that given the victim's age, the informant must have an opportunity to participate in the bail proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1312 of 2024
Appellant :- Surendra Singh Thakur Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Appellant :- Saurabh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
4. List accordingly on 07.05.2024 for disposal of plea of bail application. In the meantime, the State if so wish, may file counter affidavit/ objections vis-a-vis the prayer of bail of the appellant.
Order Date :- 19.4.2024
Muk
Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the complainant/informant must be impleaded as a respondent in the criminal appeal for suspension of sentence and bail under Section 389 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Singh Thakur
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
