Gulam Dastgeer Khan v. Tanveer Ahmad
Case brief
What is this about?
Gulam Dastgeer Khan, the appellant, indicated that the contemnot appeal was not pressed. The court consigned the appeal to the record accordingly without further proceedings.
Gulam Dastgeer Khan, the appellant, indicated that the contemnot appeal was not pressed. The court consigned the appeal to the record accordingly without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:78786-DB
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPEAL No. - 5 of 2024
Appellant :- Gulam Dastgeer Khan Respondent :- Tanveer Ahmad Counsel for Appellant :- Pt. S. Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- Nripendra Mishra
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Ayush Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pt. S. Chandra, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not want to press the instant appeal.
Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to record as not pressed.
Consigned to record.
(Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Order Date :- 26.11.2024 (Manoj K.)
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Gulam Dastgeer Khan
Tanveer Ahmad
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court