A review application seeking review of a 01.11.2022 writ judgment was dismissed, as an earlier review by another party had already been dismissed and no cogent reason for delay was offered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:27202
Court No. - 14
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 46 of 2024
Applicant :- Nand Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shishir Pradhan,Gyanendra Pratap Singh Chuahan
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the review-petitioner.
By beans of the instant review-petition, the petitioner seeks to review the judgment and order dated 01.11.2022 passed by this Court in Writ-B No. 657 of 2022.
The record indicates that against the said judgment, another party had also filed a review-application which was considered and dismissed by this Court by means of order dated 03.05.2023.
A specific query was to put to the learned counsel for the review-petitioner to indicate as to what is the reason for filing the instant review-application with much delay and that too after the first review was dismissed in May, 2023, though, by a different party to which he could not give any cogent reason.
Be that as it may, since the review-application has already been dismissed on 03.05.2023, this Court does not find that there are any cogent reason to entertain the present review-application which is accordingly dismissed .
Order Date :- 2.4.2024 Asheesh
Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Nand Lal
State Of U.P. Thru. Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Lucknow And Others
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
