Smt. Pratima Saxena v. Anil Kumar 3rd Apar Mukhya Sachiv, Shram Evam Sevayojan, U.P., Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural order granting time to file reply to affidavits of compliance in a contempt application.
Procedural order granting time to file reply to affidavits of compliance in a contempt application.
Procedural order granting time to file reply to affidavits of compliance in a contempt application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 965 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt. Pratima Saxena
Opposite Party :- Anil Kumar 3rd Apar Mukhya Sachiv, Shram Evam Sevayojan, U.P., Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Zubair Hasan,Preet Prakash Verma
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 10.4.2024 VKS
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Pratima Saxena
Anil Kumar
Rajesh Mishra
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court