Petitioner absent; Standing Counsel present. Court held the contempt petition infructuous due to efflux of time. Dismissed application and discharged notices with option for recall.
Contempt petition dismissed; notices discharged; recall application allowed within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:8208
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 893 of 2016
Applicant :- Ganga Ram Opposite Party :- Mishri Lal And 5 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Smt. Rajni B Bajpai,Hari Mohan Mathur (H.M.M Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anil Kr.Tewari,Saryu Prasad Tiwari
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the petitioner, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that by the efflux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives, he may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 29.1.2024 Anurag
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ganga Ram
Mishri Lal And 5 Ors.
Prakash Singh
Anurag Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
