In this contempt application, the High Court held that due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. The court dismissed the application as such and discharged the contempt notices issued to the opposite party.
The contempt petition was dismissed and the contempt notices were discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:8173
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1511 of 2016
Applicant :- Nagendra Singh Opposite Party :- Mahendra Kumar Tehsildar Tehsil-Patti Distt. Pratapgarh Counsel for Applicant :- Padam Kant Mishra
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the petitioner, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that by the efflux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives, he may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 29.1.2024 Anurag
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition has become infructuous due to the lapse of time.
Nagendra Singh
Mahendra Kumar Tehsildar
Shree Prakash Singh
Anurag Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
