In a contempt application, the court heard counsel for both parties who submitted that the order of the writ court had been complied with. The court accordingly dismissed the contempt application.
Contempt application dismissed and discharge application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56494
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 875 of 2024
Applicant :- Rajendra Prasad Pandey Opposite Party :- Shri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, M.D., U.P. Jal Nigam, Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Chandra,Abhay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rishabh Kapoor
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
(C.M.A. No.4/2024)
Order Date :- 14.8.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant was in contempt given that the underlying writ order has been complied with.
Rajendra Prasad Pandey
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
