Contempt application against an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate for not concluding a complaint case trial within the period directed under a Section 483 order. The court found RPF's failure to produce witnesses caused delay, held no contempt was made out, and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45378
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 671 of 2024
Applicant :- Chandraprakash Opposite Party :- Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- K.K. Singh,Faizal Hashmi
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 3.7.2024 V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Magistrate's failure to conclude trial of complaint case no.1708/2021 within the directed six months constituted willful contempt of the High Court's order dated 29.05.2023.
Chandraprakash
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
