Nirdosh Devi v. Pro. (Dr.) Prabhat Kumar Singh, Chancellor, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2024:AHC:174662 Court No. - 1 Case :-…
No. - 2024:AHC:174662 Court No. - 1 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:174662
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6471 of 2024
Applicant :- Nirdosh Devi Opposite Party :- Pro. (Dr.) Prabhat Kumar Singh, Chancellor, Uttar Pradesh University Of Medical Sciences
Counsel for Applicant :- Parvesh Kumar Pandey,Sarvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rohit Pandey
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
In pursuance to the previous order passed by this Court, Shri Rohit Pandey, Advocate, representing the opposite party has obtained instructions and on the basis of his instructions states that the representation of the petitioner has been decided and rejected by order dated 30.10.2024 passed by the Vice Chancellor of the Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, i.e., the opposite party.
The order has been handed over to the Court, which is taken on record.
As the order of the writ Court has been complied by the opposite party, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt application.
The application is disposed of.
Notices are discharged.
Let the file be consigned to record.
Order Date :- 7.11.2024 Anurag/-
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the opposite party complied with the writ court's order directing consideration of the applicant's representation.
Nirdosh Devi
Pro. (Dr.) Prabhat Kumar Singh, Chancellor, Uttar Pradesh University Of Medical Sciences
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court