In this admirably brief order, the Allahabad High Court, acting through an ex-parte hearing, held that a contempt petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The petition was dismissed without the petitioner being present.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous; contempt notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4449
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 634 of 2016
Applicant :- Amit Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- Sri Surya Prakash Singh Secretary Urban Dev.Of U.P Lko.Andanr. Counsel for Applicant :- Vidhu Bhushan Kalia,Rajat Rajan Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ram Dayal Sharma
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the petitioner, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that by the efflux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives, he may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 16.1.2024 Anurag
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Amit Kumar Singh
Anuj Krusna Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
