The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench dismissed a contempt application as infructuous due to efflux of time and discharged contempt notices, allowing recall within eight weeks if the cause of action survives.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous; contempt notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4468
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 620 of 2016
Applicant :- Narendra Bahadur Singh Opposite Party :- Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajat Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the petitioner, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that by the efflux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives, he may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 16.1.2024 Anurag
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application having become infructuous should be dismissed.
Narendra Bahadur Singh
Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav
Shree Prakash Singh
Anuj Krishna Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
