Respondent 5 and 6 called upon to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for alleged dishonour of an order passed in Writ A No. 7614 of 2024.
Notice issued to respondent nos. 5 and 6 to explain why contempt proceedings be not initiated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4696 of 2024
Applicant :- Kailash Chandra Srivastava Opposite Party :- Sri Sanjay Kumar Mishra, The Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad Gonda Counsel for Applicant :- Himanshu Shekhar,Manish Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record.
Issue notice to respondent nos. 5 and 6 to explain as to why contempt proceedings be not initiated against them for alleged willful disobedience of the order dated 10.09.2024 passed in Writ A No. 7614 of 2024.
As prayed, steps be taken within seven working days.
List this case in the week commencing 10.02.2025, as fresh.
Office is directed to submit service report by the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 17.12.2024
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kailash Chandra Srivastava
Sri Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
