Contempt application dismissed after counsel for the applicant was absent; the court noted the earlier order appeared complied with or the applicant had lost interest, discharged the notice and closed the matter.
Notice issued in the contempt application discharged; no other relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 42 of 2024
Applicant :- Dr Sudama Prasad Vidyasthali Opposite Party :- Sri Dheerendra Kumar Pandey, Branch Manager, Canara Bank
Counsel for Applicant :- Ved Byas Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Krishna Mohan Asthana
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears for the applicant. Shri Krishna Mohan Asthana, counsel for the opposite party is present.
It appears that the order of this Court has already been complied with or the applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
It would serve no useful purpose to keep the application pending.
The application is dismissed .
The notice is discharged.
Order Date :- 10.12.2024 Vipasha
Digitally signed by :- VIPASHA MUKHERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application should be kept pending when the underlying order appears complied with or the applicant has lost interest.
Dr Sudama Prasad Vidyasthali
Sri Dheerendra Kumar Pandey, Branch Manager, Canara Bank
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
