In a contempt of court application where the applicant did not appear and no return was filed, the Court observed that the order had likely been complied with or the applicant had lost interest. Consequently, it served no purpose to keep the matter pending.
The application was dismissed and the notice was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 253 of 2024
Applicant :- Abdul Rahman Opposite Party :- Radhe Shyam Yadav, Project Director And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Nandini Mishra,Navin Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Pranjal Mehrotra
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears for the applicant.
It appears that the order of this Court has already been complied with or the applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
It would serve no useful purpose to keep the application pending.
The application is dismissed .
The notice is discharged.
Order Date :- 10.12.2024 Vipasha
Digitally signed by :- VIPASHA MUKHERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rahman
Radhe Shyam Yadav
Salil Kumar Rai
Vipasha Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
