The application for a contempt notice seeking punishment for an order refusing representation was dismissed. The court held that merits of the authority's decision cannot be examined in contempt jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63246
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3644 of 2024
Applicant :- Head Constable (Civil Police) Jitendra Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- Sri Prabhakar Chaudhary, Police U.P. Maha Nirikshak (Karmik), U.P. Police Headquarter Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard.
Order Date :- 12.9.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt notice can be issued against an authority when the impugned refusal is based on a representation challenged in a writ proceeding.
Head Constable (Civil Police) Jitendra Kumar And 2 Others
Rajeev Singh
Gaurav Pal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
