In a contempt application, the court held that since the applicant's representation was already decided by the competent authority, the application lost efficacy and was dismissed.
The present contempt application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:62025
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3075 of 2024
Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Opposite Party :- Ms. Amrita Singh, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Unnao Counsel for Applicant :- Vishwa Nath Mishra
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1.Case is called out. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.
Order Date :- 9.9.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt application stands dismissed on the ground that the representation of the applicant has already been decided by the competent authority.
Sunil Kumar
Ms. Amrita Singh, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Unnao
Rajeev Singh
Gaurav Pal
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
