Contempt petition for non-compliance of a writ order. Counsel for the opposite party submitted that proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were concluded via a specific order, constituting compliance. The court found no contempt and dismissed the petition.
Contempt notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 260 of 2024
Applicant :- Chandra Kumar Opposite Party :- Roshni Yadav, S.D.M., Ambedkar Nagar
Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Om Prakash Yadav
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None is present for the petitioner.
Shri Amit Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Shri O.P. Yadav submits that order passed by the writ court has been complied with in its letter and spirit as proceedings under section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is concluded vide order dated 17.02.2024 which is annexed as Annexure no.1 of the compliance affidavit.
In view of the aforesaid, no contempt is made out.
The contempt notices are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition is dismissed.
Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 14.3.2024 mks
Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent complied with the writ court's order?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chandra Kumar
Roshni Yadav
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
