In a contempt application, the court was informed that the order impugned in the underlying writ petition was complied with. Finding no contempt made out, the court discharged the notices and dismissed the petition.
Contempt petiiton dismissed; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:1792
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 213 of 2016
Applicant :- Dr.Ishwar Chandra Opposite Party :- M.M.A Rizvi Director Karmchari Rajya Vima Yojana Chikitsa Counsel for Applicant :- Rama Shankar Dubey
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out. None present for the petitioner to press this petition.
Sri Sunil Bajpai, learned additional chief standing counsel for the State has pointed that the order was passed in writ court on 31.08.2015 in Service Bench No. 940 of 2015 which was complied with vide order dated 04.03.2016 and the copy of the order dated 04.03.2016 is appended as annexure no. 2 along with the compliance affidavit.
Thus, no contempt is made out.
In view of the aforesaid, notices are discharged
Hence, contempt petition is dismissed.
Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 8.1.2024 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
whether the applicant has committed contempt given the compliance with the impugned order.
Dr. Ishwar Chandra
M.M.A Rizvi
Mayank Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
