In a contempt application, the State counsel submitted that the impugned order dated 02.04.2015 was complied with. The single-judge bench by **Mohd. Sharif** held that no further contempt was made out, discharged the notices, and dismissed the petition.
The notices were discharged and the contempt petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:1519
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1000 of 2015
Applicant :- Mohd.Ahmad Opposite Party :- Dr.Hirdesh Kothariya Circle Officer And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Shanker
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the petitioner whereas Rajiv Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has pointed out that the order dated 02.04.2015 has been complied with and submitted that the order dated 02.04.2015 has been complied with.
In view of the aforesaid submission, no contempt is made out further.
The notices are discharged.
The contempt petition is hereby dismissed .
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 5.1.2024 Mohd. Sharif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a contempt application is maintainable when the impugned order has been complied with.
Whether notices issued in respect of the contempt application should be discharged upon compliance.
Mohd. Ahmad
Dr. Hirdesh Kothariya
Shree Prakash Singh
Mohammad Sharif
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
