The applicant in a contempt application was absent. The court found the petition now infructuous and dismissed it, discharging the contempt notices but allowing an application for recall within eight weeks.
The contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous and the contempt notices are discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:703
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1721 of 2021
Applicant :- Rajendra Pal Opposite Party :- Sanjay Upadhayay Examination Regulatory Authority Prayagraj Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Gupta,Bhartendu Chaturvedi,Rajesh Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the petitioner, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that the petitioner has no interest to press the present contempt petition. Thus, it has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives, they may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 3.1.2024 Mohd. Sharif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rajendra Pal
Sanjay Upadhayay Examination Regulatory Authority Prayagraj
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
