No intelligence to justify further order or continuation of the application.
The contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:240
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1017 of 2022
Applicant :- Ahmaduddin Chaudhary Opposite Party :- Sri Himanshu Kumar,Principal Secy. Minority Welfare And Waqf Deptt., Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Mani Tripathi,Anurag Tripathi
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for applicant/petitioner, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that the petitioners have no interest to press the present contempt petition. Thus, it has become infructuous.
Notices are discharged.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
consigned to record.
Order Date :- 2.1.2024 Mohd. Sharif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ahmaduddin Chaudhary
Sri Himanshu Kumar
Mohammad Sharif
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
