Contempt application dismissed for lack of evidence that the petitioner was notified of the interim order before the alleged contemptuous act occurred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:36748
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1668 of 2024
Applicant :- Mata Badal Opposite Party :- Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Consolidation Officer Rudauli Distt. Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Officer and as the order of the Writ Court was not in the notice of the officer, no contempt is made out, hence, the contempt petition is liable to be dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.5.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent violated an interim order by not considering it when passing a new order.
Mata Badal
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Consolidation Officer
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
