The respondent counsel confirmed that the order dated 26.2.2024 passed by the District Basic Education Officer had been complied with, satisfying the applicant's representation. Consequently, the court found the contempt application infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 164 of 2024
Applicant :- Karm Ruchi Singh Somvanshi Opposite Party :- Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Hardoi Counsel for Applicant :- Arjun Singh Somvanshi
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 3.7.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application has lost efficacy due to compliance with the lower court order?
Karm Ruchi Singh Somvanshi
Sri Vijay Pratap Singh
Rajeev Singh
Gaurav Pal
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
