Disposed

Vishal Kumar Gupta v. Vinay Ranjan Consolidation Officer Gauriganj Amethi

Allahabad HC22 Jul 2024CAPL/1559/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt application alleging non-compliance with a writ court direction to decide the applicant's representation and supply copies of consolidation orders. The respondent showed compliance; the representation was decided on 11.6.2024. Court found no contempt, disposed of the application, directing supply of certified copies of documents if applied for.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vishal Kumar Gupta vs Vinay Ranjan Consolidation Officer… — Contempt of Court | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:49141

¶2

Court No. - 17

¶3

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1559 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Vishal Kumar Gupta

¶5

Opposite Party :- Vinay Ranjan Consolidation Officer Gauriganj Amethi Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav

¶6

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶7

On 10th July, 2024, following order was passed.

¶8

"1. In pursuance of earlier order, Sri Vinayak Saxena, learned Standing Counsel filed affidavit of compliance duly sworn by Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Consolidation Officer, Gauriganj, Amethi and same is taken on record.

¶9

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that representation of the applicant has already been decided on 11.6.2024. He also submits that Gata No.679/4 was recorded in the name of applicant & one another person and applicant was the recorded tenure holder of the aforesaid gata, area 0.206 hectare but during the consolidation period in the most mechanical manner his area is reduced by the Consolidation Officers. He also submits that all the facts have already been considered by the Consolidation Officer in his order dated 11.6.2024.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that till today copy of the order dated 8.2.2021 passed in Case No.2051-2052 has not been provided to him as the same is being hidden by the Consolidation Officer.

¶11

List this case on 22.7.2024.

¶12

On the next date, respondent shall appear before this Court alongwith record of Case No.2051-2052."

¶13

In pursuance of the aforesaid order, respondent-Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Consolidation Officer, Gauriganj, Amethi is present before this Court, who while placing written instructions dated 20.07.2024, informs that certified copy of the order 08.02.2021 is already provided to the applicant. He also informs that, in case, applicant moves any application for obtaining certified copes of the objection under Section 9A of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act dated 18.01.2021, the application dated 19.01.2021, delay condonation application, affidavit as well as compromise dated 19.01.2021, the same will be provided to him within three days from the date of moving of such application.

¶14

It is undisputed fact that the direction was issued by the writ Court for deciding the representation of the applicant, which has already been decided. Accordingly, no contempt is made out.

¶15

In view of above, the contempt application stands disposed of with the direction to the respondent-Officer to provide certified copies of the documents to the applicant, as mentioned above, in case, any such application is filed by the applicant.

¶16

Original record placed by the respondent-Officer is returned to him.

¶17

Order Date :- 22.7.2024 VKS

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vishal Kumar Gupta v. Vinay Ranjan Consolidation Officer Gauriganj Amethi

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vishal Kumar Gupta v. Vinay Ranjan Consolidation Officer Gauriganj Amethi

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Saroj Kumar Mukherjee Vs Rajiv Kumar Srivastava / Addl. General Manager (Unit Head), I.T.I. Ltd, Raebareli

Hori Lal and Others Vs Sri Anand Kumar Singh, M.D., Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd. Lko.

Sharvan Kumar Srivastava Vs Sri Anand Kumar Singh, M.D., Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd., Lko.

Rajendra Prasad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Deptt. Govt. Lko. and 6 Others

Smt. Maya Devi vs Smt. Nidhi Bansal, Chief Development Officer, Sitapur

Nand Lal vs Sri Abhishek Shukla, Distt. Panchayat Raj Officer, Dist. Sultanpur