Application for deferral of hearing in contempt proceedings rejected as the respondent's preference of a Special Appeal against the writ court order is not a valid ground for adjournment. Matter listed for further proceedings with a warning that non-compliance will lead to framing of charges.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1257 of 2024
Applicant :- Suresh Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- Mr. Nitin Bansal Director Local Bodies, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sarvesh Kumar Saxena,Mridula Saxena
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 7.5.2024 VKS
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Suresh Kumar Sharma
Mr. Nitin Bansal
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
