This court dismissed a contempt application as infructuous due to the passage of time and discharged the contempt notices issued against the applicants.
Contempt petition dismissed; contempt notices discharged; time allowed to move for recall.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:16867
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1031 of 2015
Applicant :- Balak Ram And Ors. Opposite Party :- Saumyya Agrawal Collector Unnao Counsel for Applicant :- Pramendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- C S C
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the applicants, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that by the efflux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the applicants feel that the cause of action still survives, they may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 23.2.2024 Ram Murti
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition has become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
Balak Ram And Ors.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
