The appellant challenged the trial court's judgment which acquitted the accused of serious charges like attempt to murder and convicted them only for voluntarily causing hurt. The court held that even if the injury location was miscited, the injuries were minor and the conviction under Section 323 IPC was justified. The appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:172441-DB
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. - 452 of 2024
Appellant :- Smt Poonam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Appellant : - Mandvi Tripathi,Santosh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
i. A L.W. (lacerated wound) 8cm X 0.5cm are Rt. parietal region of skull 9cm above ear KUO.
ii. C/O pain Rt. side chest.
iii. C/O loosening of Lt. lower I molar KUO
iv. An abrasion 2cm X 0.5cm over Rt. palmar region @ Rt. thumb.
"Injury nos. 1, 2 & 4 is simple in nature thumb caused by injury (4)
some friction against rough surface. Injury 1 & 3 are KUO & refer to DCH Baghpat & further management."
Order Date :- 5.11.2024 Ruchi Agrahari
(Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.) (Siddharth, J.)
Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court's finding regarding the location of the injury was unwarranted and justified setting aside the acquittal on serious charges?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt Poonam
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Siddharth
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
