Allowed

Virendra Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2024BAIL/9575/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application allowed. The court held the applicant is entitled to bail considering he was already enlarged on bail in other cases. The applicant was ordered released under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities Act on personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in Case Crime/FIR No. 109 of 2024 on personal bond with two sureties.

Virendra Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:61929

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9575 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Virendra Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Naveen Kumar Pandey,Kusuma Devi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart. The applicant is in custody since 05.04.2024.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Virendra Yadav be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 109 of 2024, under Sections 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Chhapiya, District Gonda, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶12

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission;

¶13

and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 9.9.2024 Arun

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Virendra Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Priyanka Singh vs Sujeet Kumar Singh

Meenu Sirah vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Mohammad Mukhtar vs Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No. 24, Lko. and 4 Others

Shabnam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow and Another

Rahul @ Anand vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Divya Singh vs Principaal Judge Family Court Hardoi and another