Meenu Sirah v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application to quash criminal proceedings under Section 504 IPC was admitted on notice. Court cited Fiona Shrikhande and Chhedilal cases. Proceedings kept in abeyance.
What the court decided
Court No. - 13
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7934 of 2024
Applicant :- Meenu Sirah Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abdullah Ramzi Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Heard.
Present application has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire impugned criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 80 of 2021, arising out of Case Crime No. 521 of 2020 under Section 504 IPC as well as Charge Sheet No. 01 dated 02.10.2020 including the order dated 22.08.2024 whereby the application seeking discharge was rejected by the A.C.J.M., Court No. 30, Lucknow.
It is stated that on 17.09.2020 the applicant lodged an FIR, registered as FIR No. 0520 of 2020 under Section 4/3 D.P. Act & Section 506, 504, 498-A, 463, 356, 323 IPC, P.S.-Para, District-Lucknow West (Commissionerate Lucknow) implicating opposite party No.2/father-in-law(Sayed Wakeel Ahmad) as also the husband/Sayed Mohd. Afzal, mother-inlaw/Kahkashan Parveen, sister-in-law/Shumaila and in counter blast just to settle the dispute, the opposite party No. 2/Syed Wakeel Ahmad lodged the FIR, registered as FIR No. 0521 of 2020 making allegations therein to attract the offence under Section 323, 452, 504, 506 IPC indicating therein date of incident as 15.09.2020 implicating present applicant and also Abdul Wazid @ Tehseen and Smt. Farhat Nakvi and 3-4 unknown persons. According to this FIR, the accused, indicated in the FIR, entered into the house of the informant and there they abused the informant and others who were present in the house and there some altercation also took place between the parties.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Section 504 IPC arising from a counter-blast FIR should be quashed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Meenu Sirah
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
- respondent
Sayed Wakeel Ahmad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/7934/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Pankaj Bhatia
- Order 2 · Pankaj Bhatia
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Balveer Singh @ Veeru @ Virendra Karanval Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko.
Afzaal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko
Kasim Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Mohammad Mukhtar vs Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No. 24, Lko. and 4 Others