Allowed

Azeem v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC31 Aug 2024BAIL/9316/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed a bail application filed by Azeem in an FIR under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The court granted release on bail with personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 20,000 each, subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, subject to conditions to attend hearings, not commit similar offences, and not interfere with evidence or witnesses.

Azeem vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:59622

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9316 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Azeem Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Tripathi,Prince Verma,Varsha Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.200 of 2024, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Tambore, District Sitapur.

¶8

3 . Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart. The copies of the bail orders are on record.

¶9

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Azeem be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 31.8.2024

¶16

akverma

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Azeem v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Azeem v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Jai Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko.

Raju @ Shesh Narayan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Manish Dixit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Azeem Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.