Allowed

Ritesh Gupta v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Allahabad HC23 Aug 2024BAIL/9027/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the applicant in a case involving dowry death allegations. The court noted the absence of specific pre-death dowry harassment allegations and the applicant's clean record.

What did the court decide?

The applicant released on bail via personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each, subject to standard bail conditions regarding attendance and non-interference.

Ritesh Gupta vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:57594

¶2

Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9027 of 2024 Applicant :- Ritesh Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Naresh Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶4

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶5

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.116 of 2024, under Section 498A, 304B IPC & Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Sohramau, District Unnao.

¶6

3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was married to the applicant and sufficient dowry was given. Subsequently, the entire family member killed her. The cause of death as per the postmortem report, is ante mortem hanging and apart from the ligature mark, one contusion injury was observed which, according to the applicant, could have happened when the body was lowered.

¶7

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶8

5. Considering the post-mortem report and the fact that there is no allegation that soon before the death, the victim was subjected to any mental or physical harassment in relation to demand of dowry at the instance of the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal history and is in custody since 23.07.2024, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed .

¶9

6. Let the applicant Ritesh Gupta be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶10

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶11

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶12

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶13

Order Date :- 23.8.2024 nishant

¶14

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ritesh Gupta v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritesh Gupta v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sana Ullah Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Surjeet Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Chotu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Ritesh Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Rafiullah Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko.

Riyajul Hasan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.