This judgment grants bail to the applicant in a case involvingSections 366, 376, IPC. The court noted inordinate unexplained delay in FIR lodging, absence of specific statement against the applicant, and no criminal history.
Release on bail with a personal bond and two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:57293
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8111 of 2024
Applicant :- Surjeet Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Smriti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 22.8.2024 VNP/-
Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant given the inordinate delay in lodging the FIR and lack of specific statement against him.
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering no criminal history and co-accused have been released on bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surjeet
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
