Allowed

Imtiyaaz v. State of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko

Allahabad HC21 Aug 2024BAIL/8943/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under the UP Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act for FIR 0091 of 2024, PS Baskhari, Ambedkar Nagar. Applicant had been granted bail in the two cases shown in his gang chart; AGA did not contradict this. Court allowed bail with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Imtiyaaz to be released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, with conditions regarding attendance, no similar offences, and no tampering.

Imtiyaaz vs State of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56919

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8943 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Imtiyaaz Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Chandan Verma,Anurag Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.0091 of 2024 under section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Baskhari, District Ambedkar Nagar.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that two cases have been shown in the Gang Chart in which the applicant has been granted bail. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in cases shown against him, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Imtiyaaz be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 21.8.2024 VNP/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Imtiyaaz v. State of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imtiyaaz v. State of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jai Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lucknow and 3 Others

Ashlendra Pratap Singh @ Dabbu Singh (in Fir Ashlendra @ Dabbu Singh) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home

Amit Savita @ Anshu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Home Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Santlal Nishad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Rahul Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Imamuddin @ Nanguttu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 3 Others