Allowed

Santlal Nishad v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC21 Aug 2024/8953/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Ahmedabad High Court at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench allowed the bail application of Santlal Nishad under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The court held him entitled to bail as he was already granted bail in the sole other case against him.

What did the court decide?

Allowed bail application; released applicant on personal bond and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each subject to conditions of attending hearings, committing no similar offence, and not tampering with evid

Santlal Nishad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56843

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8953 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Santlal Nishad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Rizwanul Haque Ansari,Santi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.202 of 2024 under section 2(b) (17)/3 U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Sampurnanagar, District Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the sole case shown in the Gang Chart, the applicant has been granted bail. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the sole case shown against him, he is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Santlal Nishad be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 21.8.2024 VNP/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Santlal Nishad v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santlal Nishad v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jai Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lucknow and 3 Others

Ashlendra Pratap Singh @ Dabbu Singh (in Fir Ashlendra @ Dabbu Singh) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home

Amit Savita @ Anshu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Home Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Rahul Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Imamuddin @ Nanguttu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 3 Others

Gulfam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.