Allowed

Sandeep Maitee v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC2 Aug 2024BAIL/8159/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the bail application of Sandeep Maitee in a criminal case involving cheating and forgery charges, imposing conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensuring witness appearance.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Sandeep Maitee shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount, subject to conditions to not tamper with evidence or pressurize witnesses.

Sandeep Maitee vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:78836

¶2

Court No. - 29

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8159 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Sandeep Maitee Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Krishna Kumar Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anant Pratap Singh, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶7

The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 556 of 2020, under Section 34, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow.

¶8

The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 12.12.2020 against eight named persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant had made some investments in Vishwas Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. but upon maturity, no returns were paid.

¶9

In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case.The applicant's involvement in 31 other cases has been disclosed in para 16 of the affidavit, in 11 of which he has already been granted bail.

¶10

It has been stated in the affidavit that the applicant is neither a director nor any other position holder in the aforesaid company and in fact he had also made some investments in the company and he had been duped by the company.

¶11

Co-accused namely, Dhiraj Bahadur Singh Yadav has been granted by means of an order dated 22.12.2023 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.15318 of 2023.

¶12

The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶13

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case.

¶14

Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶15

Let the applicant- Sandeep Maitee be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶16

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶17

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

¶18

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶19

(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)

¶20

Order Date :- 27.11.2024 -Amit K-

¶21

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sandeep Maitee v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Maitee v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Atul Kumar Verma vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Ankit Verma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko

Dinesh Kumar Tripathi and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Smt. Komal Shahi vs Ankur Jaiswal

Mohan Rawat vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Meera Srivastava vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko