Allowed

Babu Ram Nishad v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC2 Jul 2024BAIL/7078/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed a bail application filed by Babu Ram Nishad. The court was satisfied that the applicant was on bail in all referred cases under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities Act. Bail was granted with personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 20,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail with a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each.

Babu Ram Nishad vs State of U.P Thru… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:44829

¶2

Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7078 of 2024 Applicant :- Babu Ram Nishad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶4

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶5

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.110 of 2024, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Bhiti, District Ambedkar Nagar.

¶6

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in all the cases referred to in the Gang Chart, the applicant has been granted bail. Copies of the bail orders are on record. The other cases of criminal history have been duly explained in the supplementary affidavit filed today in Court, which is taken on record.

¶7

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶8

5. Considering the fact that the applicant is on bail in all the cases referred to in the gang chart, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶9

6. Let the applicant Babu Ram Nishad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶10

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶11

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶12

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶13

Order Date :- 2.7.2024 nishant

¶14

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Babu Ram Nishad v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu Ram Nishad v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dinesh Kumar Gautam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt.

Chhotkann (Major B.C.) Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow and Anothers

Sumit Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Babu Ram Nishad Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.

Sandeep Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Raj Kumar @ Raju vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.