The applicant sought bail in a case involving forgery, cheating, and criminal conspiracy. The court, considering the nature of the offence, pending gangster act case, and opposition by the State, rejected the second bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:52296
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 704 of 2024
Applicant :- Shivam Mehrotra @ Shivam Malhotra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home Department U.P Government Civil Secretariat Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Pratap,Shashank Shekhar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ankit Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A., material available on record, contents of F.I.R., other relevant documents, nature of offence as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail, accordingly, the bail application is hereby rejected .
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Is the applicant entitled to bail in a second bail application for offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, and 120-B IPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivam Mehrotra @ Shivam Malhotra
State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home Department U.P Government Civil Secretariat Lucknow
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
