Allowed

Amit Kumar v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Allahabad HC25 Jun 2024BAIL/6216/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court dismissed the bail opposition and granted bail to the applicant in a crime registered under the U.P. Gangsters Act, subject to furnishing a personal bond with two sureties and undertaking specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 204 of 2022 under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

Amit Kumar vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45021

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6216 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Amit Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

¶5

Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Amir Hasan,Afaq Zaki Khan

¶6

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶7

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶8

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶9

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that three cases shown in the gang-chart, the applicant is on bail in one of the cases and in the other two cases he has been exonerated. The applicant is in custody since 07.06.2022.

¶10

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶11

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the aforesaid fact, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant Amit Kumar be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 204 of 2022 , under Sections 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Ibrahimpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to

¶14

undertake to attend the hearings;

¶15

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission;

¶16

and

¶17

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

Order Date :- 2.7.2024 Arun

¶19

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Amit Kumar v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vishal Jaiswal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. and 3 Others

Ram Kishore vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Ujair vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko and 3 Others

Ram Dayal vs State of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy., Food and Civil Supply Lucknow. and Others

Pankaj Raj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Alan Alias Mukesh Saroj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others