Allowed

Bablu @ Karan Singh Karam v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Allahabad HC4 Jun 2024BAIL/6156/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge bail applicant sought release from custody. Court granted bail in Case Crime/FIR No. 50 of 2022 registered under the U.P. Gangsters Act, requiring a personal bond with two sureties and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in Case Crime/FIR No. 50 of 2022 upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties each, subject to conditions of attending hearings, avoiding similar offences, and not tamper

Bablu @ Karan Singh Karam vs State of U.P… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:47258

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6156 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Bablu @ Karan Singh Karam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Counter affidavit filed today by learned AGA is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶8

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart. The applicant is in custody since 04.12.2021.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Bablu @ Karan Singh Karam be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 50 of 2022, under Sections 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Patranga, District Ayodhya, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission;

¶14

and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 11.7.2024 Arun

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Bablu @ Karan Singh Karam v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu @ Karan Singh Karam v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shaktimaan Sahu vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Ravinder Singh vs Narcotics Control Bureau Lko.

Narendra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Rakesh Kumar Pathak Alias Pappu Pathak vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Deptt. Govt. of U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko.

Munna Lal Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Atul Gupta vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others