Gopi Chauhan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and 3 Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:50174

Court No. - 12

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5092 of 2024

Applicant :- Gopi Chauhan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Nayak,Vijyant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.026 of 2024, under Section 363, 376D.A., 323, 504, 506 IPC, Section 5/6 of POCSO Act & Section 3(2)5 of SC/ST Act, P.S. Maharuwa, District Ambedkar Nagar.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused was enlarged on bail vide order dated 02.07.2024 mainly on the ground that the victim has turned hostile.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶10

Considering the allegation to be similar to the co-accused and adopting the same reasoning as contained in the order dated 02.07.2024, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Gopi Chauhan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or

¶14

suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 24.7.2024 Arun

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Gopi Chauhan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopi Chauhan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Afzal Quraishi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Ashok Chaurasia @ Ashok Kumar Chaurasia Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Rangilal Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Sujeet Kashyap Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Gopi Chauhan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and 3 Others