Suraj Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5060 of 2024
Applicant :- Suraj Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Chandra Srivastava,Vijay Kumar Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Suresh Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Raj Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and Sri Deepak Kumar, learned counsel, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant/ informant, the same is taken on record.
2. Let the counter affidavit be filed within a period of ten days.
3. List this case on 21.05.2024 within top ten cases.
4. When the case is next listed, name of Sri Deepak Kumar, Advocate be printed in the cause list as counsel for the opposite parties.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Suraj Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/5060/2024
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court