Allowed

Brajesh Kumar Awasthi in F.I.R Brajesh Awasthi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Lko

Allahabad HC7 May 2024BAIL/4929/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was allowed. The court released the applicant on bail in a case registered under the U.P. Gangsters Act, 1986, on the condition that he furnishes a personal bond with two sureties and adheres to specific conditions regarding attendance and conduct.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in FIR No. 791 of 2023 by furnishing personal bond with two sureties.

Brajesh Kumar Awasthi in F.I.R Brajesh Awasthi vs State… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:77417

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4929 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Brajesh Kumar Awasthi In F.I.R Brajesh Awasthi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- A.Z. Siddiqui,Prateek Tewari,Raj Nath Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart. The criminal history of the applicant has been duly explained in the bail application.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Brajesh Kumar Awasthi be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 791 of 2023, under Sections 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶12

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission;

¶13

and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 22.11.2024 Arun

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Brajesh Kumar Awasthi in F.I.R Brajesh Awasthi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brajesh Kumar Awasthi in F.I.R Brajesh Awasthi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mithlesh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko.

Antim Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Manish Agrawal vs State of U.P. Thru. C.B.I. Lucknow

Umesh Dikshit vs Smt. Indra Agnihotri and 5 Others

Suraj Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home