Allowed

Satish Saroj @ Kaka v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC6 May 2024BAIL/4846/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, this High Court allowed the prayer for bail on the grounds that the applicant had already been granted bail in the primary case and posed no flight risk. The applicant was ordered to furnish a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Satish Saroj @ Kaka vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34861

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4846 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Satish Saroj @ Kaka Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.229 of 2023 under section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Hathigawan, District Pratapgarh.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the sole case shown in the Gang Chart, the applicant has been granted bail. Other than that, the applicant has also been implicated in two other cases in which he is also on bail. The applicant is in jail since 07.03.2024. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases shown against him, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Satish Saroj @ Kaka be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶13

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 6.5.2024 VNP/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Satish Saroj @ Kaka v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Saroj @ Kaka v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Roopam Chaudhary and 3 Others vs Addl. District Judge Court No. 3 Unnao and Another

Deepak Rajbhar vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Ministry of Home Affairs Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Manoj Kumar and Others vs Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sadar, Pratapgarh and Another

Akram vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Shoeb vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Rahul vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others